![slay the spire ascension guide slay the spire ascension guide](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qMrMfZP2uEA/maxresdefault.jpg)
For instance, if one is playing through an RPG and reaches a moment where they get stuck, exhaust all apparent paths toward progress, and are on the verge of simply abandoning the game. There are plenty of situations where I think it would be appropriate to use a walkthrough for a game. Obviously, in an ideal scenario, a game would be designed in such a way that external resources are unneeded, but we don’t live in the best of all possible worlds, and so walkthroughs and wiki pages have their place. I simply don’t believe any of that, and I need that to be completely clear for the argument that follows to have its fair share of credibility. The most important thing for me to clear up right away is that this is not an article about how people just need to “git gud,” nor that people should never look up walkthroughs, nor that people who need extra assistance to beat games are failures, nor anything like that. When to Seek Guidance, and When to Avoid It: I intend to argue here that doing so is tantamount to telling new players to skip the most engaging and valuable content of Slay the Spire. The advice in question runs rampant in the forums across the web dedicated to the game, and even feels implied in the words of the developers within the game’s graphics settings when they say that they “recommend Borderless Fullscreen for fast alt-tab.” The relevant advice is to make use of secondary resources-such as watching high-level players in order to “learn the game,” or having a wiki open while playing. I feel that these facts must be patently obvious to most players of Slay the Spire, yet I’ve encountered again and again people who give new players some truly objectionable advice which would never come from someone that understood those precepts. Figuring out which strategies work and which strategies don’t work forms nearly the entire gameplay loop and motivation structure of the game throughout nearly the entire time a player will spend with it. In theory, barring some truly horrendous luck, a person who has robust strategies should be able to beat the game a reasonable proportion of the time, even at high ascension levels. The principal challenge of Slay the Spire-as in its broader strategy siblings-is, as the name of the genre implies, developing and executing an effective strategy. On succeeding, the player unlocks a slightly harder version of the game for the character that won, up to a maximum of 20 difficulty modifiers (a system called ‘ascension’ in-game).ĭeck-building games, like most games with card-based combat, are a subset of the strategy genre. Each run begins with a small standard deck, which the player improves, expands, contracts, and (ideally) eventually uses to conquer 50-54 floors of the spire. Each of the game’s characters has a unique set of cards from which options are randomized and dealt to the player during each run, usually as a choice of one from three at a time.
![slay the spire ascension guide slay the spire ascension guide](https://cdn-www.bluestacks.com/bs-images/SW_ToAGuide_S8.jpg)
The deck-building roguelike Slay the Spire is a well-designed, challenging, engaging game.